Re: [Discuss-sudbury-model] "setting limits"

From: Woty <wotyfree_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun Oct 29 21:35:00 2006

Scott,

If it was the no running and roughhousing rule being transgressed, do
you think it would make a difference whether it was a staff member or
a student who saw it?

~Woty

On Oct 29, 2006, at 20:22, Scott David Gray wrote:

> Well, I can't speak for any of the many, many schools that use the
> word "democratic" to describe themselves, but which are clearly *not*
> democratic by any reasonable use of the term.
>
> However, in a Sudbury school, an adult who wanted to take action in
> response to a behavior which the School Meeting had forbidden by
> statute (e.g. "abuse of property") would do the exact same thing as
> *any* member of that community would/could. In our case at Sudbury
> Valley, one would write a judicial complaint (to be reviewed by our
> "Judicial Committee -- akin to a grand jury), and let due process of
> law take its course.
>
> On 10/29/06, Wendy Lucas <lucas.wendy_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm curious where democratic education handles what most schools call
>> "setting limits". For example, let's say there was a group of
>> children
>> jumping on some couches. They aren't in danger of hurting
>> themselves, but of
>> course if this behavior continues, they will damage the couches.
>> Let's say
>> "no jumping on couches" is not in the school lawbook yet. How
>> would a
>> teacher at a democratic school react in the moment of finding
>> these children
>> doing this?
>>
>> -Wendy
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -- Scott David Gray
> reply-to: sgray_at_unseelie.org
> http://www.unseelie.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-sudbury-model mailing list
> Discuss-sudbury-model_at_sudval.org
> http://www.sudval.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/discuss-sudbury-model
Received on Sun Oct 29 2006 - 21:34:30 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 04 2007 - 00:03:15 EDT