Re: [Discuss-sudbury-model] Extreme examples of traditional schools

From: Woty <woty_at_bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu Oct 6 18:31:00 2005

David,

Compulsory participation in fun group activities does not resemble a
democratic school any more closely than compulsory participation in
individual activities.

~Woty

On Oct 6, 2005, at 12:06, David Rovner wrote:

>
> "traditional school doesn't have to = hell", and
> the more traditional school resembles democratic school, the better.
>
> ~ David
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark MacFadyen
> To: discuss-sudbury-model_at_sudval.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 4:31 PM
> Subject: [Discuss-sudbury-model] Extreme examples of traditional
> schools
>
> I've been reading some of the archives and noticed the examples of
> traditional schooling are really extreme. Some of these schools
> sound like they're right out of the dark ages. I teach in a privite
> traditional school; however, we are very humanistic in our
> approach, and I do a lot of project based learning. Kids go to the
> bathroom whenever they like, and there is a fun, positive
> atmosphere about the school. We help each other, learn together
> cooperatively. Still, report cards, evaluating children, and many
> other aspects of my traditional school are absolutely wrong. I know
> my school crushes creativity, it is the worst possible model for
> the education of children. But I want to make the point that, well,
> traditional school doesn't have to = hell.
>
> Mark
>
Received on Thu Oct 06 2005 - 18:30:12 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 04 2007 - 00:03:12 EDT