Re: [Discuss-sudbury-model] Sudbury & literacy

From: Shelli Buhr <shellibuhr_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue Nov 30 00:53:00 2004

I agree. Reading the post written by Todd I felt was
rude. I dont always have time to spell check nor do I
go back and re-read what I have written. But I am a
published author in spite of my typos.

Shelli

--- Dannyasher_at_aol.com wrote:

>
> Todd,
>
> I am appalled by the lack of civility of your post,
> and surprised that it
> was allowed to appear, given the list's policy
> against personal attacks. You
> owe Dr. Hughes an apology, at the least, and the
> list as well.
>
> Daniel Greenberg
> Sudbury Valley School
>
>
> In a message dated 11/29/2004 6:03:26 PM Eastern
> Standard Time,
> knowledge_at_pratum.com writes:
>
> I for one have been worried--ever since I
> subscribed to this Sudbury email
> discussion--with the terrible language skills used
> here, such as the posting
> by Dr. Evan Hughes which was full of so many errors
> and gross violations of
> English that I wondered, Dr. Hughes, if you have a
> learning disability? This
> would be good to know considering the nature of the
> posting. Are there
> other Sudbury people who are troubled by the
> frequent postings to this discussion that are poorly
> written? Is this a
> taboo subject at Sudbury schools? Or do Sudbury
> people believe that
> good reading and writing skills are not very
> important? Or only for those
> naturally gifted? I would like to
> know.
>
>
>
>

=====

Worrying does not empty tomorrow of its troubles.

It empties today of its strength... Only Love is Real!

                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
 
Received on Tue Nov 30 2004 - 00:52:40 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 04 2007 - 00:03:09 EDT