[Discuss-sudbury-model] Underground History of American Education

From: David Rovner <rovners_at_netvision.net.il>
Date: Mon Jul 7 16:03:00 2003

The Sudbury Valley School
http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/3d.htm

I know a school for kids ages three to eighteen that doesnít teach anybody to read, yet everyone who goes there learns to do it, most very well. Itís the beautiful Sudbury Valley School, twenty miles west of Boston in the old Nathaniel Bowditch "cottage" (which looks suspiciously like a mansion), a place ringed by handsome outbuildings, a private lake, woods, and acres of magnificent grounds. Sudbury is a private school, but with a tuition under $4,000 a year itís considerably cheaper than a seat in a New York City public school. At Sudbury kids teach themselves to read; they learn at many different ages, even into the teen years (though thatís rare). When each kid is ready he or she self-instructs, if such a formal label isnít inappropriate for such a natural undertaking. During this time they are free to request as much adult assistance as needed. That usually isnít much.
In thirty years of operation, Sudbury has never had a single kid who didnít learn to read. All this is aided by a magnificent school library on open shelves where books are borrowed and returned on the honor system. About 65 percent of Sudbury kids go on to good colleges. The place has never seen a case of dyslexia. (Thatís not to say some kids donít reverse letters and such from time to time, but such conditions are temporary and self-correcting unless institutionalized into a disease.) So Sudbury doesnít even teach reading yet all its kids learn to read and even like reading. What could be going on there that we donít understand?

~ David
Received on Mon Jul 07 2003 - 16:02:17 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 04 2007 - 00:03:05 EDT