----- Original Message -----
From: "Ardeshir Mehta, N.D." <email@example.com>
> One cannot excuse the coersive nature of most *public* schools by
> saying that if the child wants to leave, he / she can always do so.
> And if this argument applies to public schools, then surely it ap-
> plies to *all* schools.
It is an unfortunate truth of economics and law that most parents/students
do NOT believe they can always leave if they want. Therefore, this argument
does NOT apply to most people in public schools (your Cyrus and my Kelly
> So the question still stands: What would it take for Sudbury to aban-
> don coerciveness in favour of non-coercive methods of conflict reso-
> lution, such as, in Deutsch's terms, seeking "common preferences"?
> For if it doesn't, it can hardly be -- as Martha Stewart might put it --
> "a good thing". (Would *you* say it is?)
My experience at The Highland School and what I know of SVS says that that
is what almost all SM and JC deliberations become: a search for common
preferences. It is couched in the language and practice of democracy, as
versus consensus, but the outcome is usually the same.
If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
firstname.lastname@example.org (do NOT reply to the mailing list) with the following
phrase in the BODY (not the subject) of the message, replacing
"email@example.com" with the email address that you subscribed under:
unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model firstname.lastname@example.org
If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too much,
you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to
This mailing list is archived at http://www.sudval.org/~sdg/archives
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Mar 27 2002 - 19:39:49 EST