Re: DSM: Re: TCS (Taking Children Seriously): Non-coercive Schools?

From: Ardeshir Mehta, N.D. (ardeshir@sympatico.ca)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 19:16:03 EST


Hi Todd,

Thanks for the heads-up.

You wrote:

> Ardeshir, Joe has a great piece about TCS on his website (http://www.jazztbone.com/2000/2000_5_8.htm).
>
> I went through this piece. My feeling on reading it was, basically, that Joe was getting ticked off by things some TCS
> list subscribers said, but not about the TCS philosophy itself, which stresses common preferences over coersion -- and
> which is really hard to argue against!
>
> If a common preference had been found, in his example, between the parent he talks about, the 13-year-old, and the
> 26-year-old, then what would have been the harm? Indeed I would think that would have been a lot better than so-called
> "law-enforcement", which is often simply a euphemism for strong-arm tactics.
>
> I admit that it is hard for me to believe that common perferences can be found in all cases. Perhaps they can -- as
> the TCS philosophy claims -- and perhaps they can't; but that's another debate. But wherever they can be found I would
> much prefer them to strong-arm tactics -- and so, I think, would anyone else, especially if they were on the
> "receiving end of the stick", as it were!
>
> You added:
>
> There are also some great links in the DSM archives about democracy vs. conensus -- I'm sure Scott has those at his
> fingertips, because I know he's posted them before.
>
> I shall certainly look them up. I also disagree that the claim "Whatever the time of day, and whatever their age,
> students in the [Sudbury Valley] school are all doing what they want to do." sounds hollow just because it is not
> literally true if looked at on a second-by-second or minute-by-minute basis. I think that it is clear (or becomes
> clear with just a little reading of the site) that the claim means students are free from most or all of the
> institutional restrictions traditionally imposed on children in schools.
>
> If that's all it means, it may not be hollow, but is certainly insufficient, at least in my mind, to allow SVS to
> justifiably call itself a "Free School". True freedom does not permit such a distinction.
>
> The only thing one should not be allowed to do, in my view, is to curtail the freedom of others. That, to my mind, is
> the only justifiable restriction that can be imposed on absolute freedom.
>
> Best,
>
>
>
>
> Ardeshir <http://homepage.mac.com/ardeshir/AllMyFiles.html>
>
> ************************************************************
>
> BTW: What about the offering of the money which goes towards paying the fees to SVS to the child himself/herself?
>
> A.

===========

If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
majordomo@sudval.org (do NOT reply to the mailing list) with the following
phrase in the BODY (not the subject) of the message, replacing
"email@host.dom" with the email address that you subscribed under:

unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model email@host.dom

If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too much,
you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to
"dsm-digest"

This mailing list is archived at http://www.sudval.org/~sdg/archives



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Mar 27 2002 - 19:39:49 EST