I enjoyed reading this intereaction.
At first when I was getting inspired to create a different kind of education
system, I felt that my personal beliefs were key in implementing into the
curriculam. But after reading the book, Free at Last, which I received from
a website called abraham-hicks.com, I recognized that being my experience as
a teacher of metaphysics and energy medicine, wouldnt be applicable in any
curriculam. (Eye opening for my ego by the way)
At first, I had a hard time with the understanding that there is no
curriculam. I had to really explore this from the perspective of being a
child, what would I have chosen?
It sure took my imagination on a whirlwind as I discovered that I rather
enjoy the arts, drama, writing, music, etc. I can honestly say that I would
have chosen completely different things than what I did.
Even though my daughters are 16 and 17, I wish they too could have gone
through the experience of choosing ther own way and means of learning. Just
like the beliefs being different, both of my children have learned in very
unique ways. But they have both learned, none-the-less.
The reason I felt this was because it made so much sense to let the children
choose for themselves is becuase of the value I believe in by tap into their
own natural and individual divine spark. This is where genius originates
Although I truly wish I could be part of the actual teaching of these
children, to experience their growth by watching first hand, I know that I
have nothing to offer here other than to just bring the school together so
they can do their magic.
I am the editor for a newsletter and the march issue is on the Magical
Child. The focus is on school philosophies and embracing the divinity in
each child. Would anyone care to contribute something? Please feel free to
send me a personal email. Thanks!
----- Original Message -----
From: Ardeshir Mehta, N.D. <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: DSM: students rights
> Hi Travis:
> You wrote:
> > In a message dated 1/23/2002 12:50:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > email@example.com writes:
> > << And even with the 12-year-old who CAN'T (or doesn't WANT to)
> >read, one should also ask oneself: "What CAN they do?" and
> >"What does he WANT to do?" -- rather than the opposite.
> >Because suppose the young chap (or lassie) is great at painting, or
> >photography, or playing the violin, or driving go-carts and winning
> >every single race into which s/he enters: what does it matter, then,
> >that s/he can't or won't read? S/He could easily make a living doing
> >something which doesn't call for reading. >>
> > Do you know, reading your e-mail, I was truly pleased at how you
> > generally hit the nail on the head. Essentially, you were pointing out
> > that I had previously failed to convey.
> > I was slightly disheartened, however,
> > later in your e-mail. My feelings specifically pertain to your
> > contained in the top and middle of this e-mail. I will briefly explain.
> > "And even with the 12-year-old who CAN'T (or doesn't WANT to)
> > read, one should also ask oneself: "What CAN they do?" and
> > "What does he WANT to do?" -- rather than the opposite."
> > About this statement, I vehemently disagree. That is, assuming that its
> > is implying what I think it is. Are you proposing that a 12 year old who
> > attempts to learn to read, but cannot, focus on what they "can" do
> No, no, of course not. I mean that EVERYBODY should concen-
> trate on what they CAN do rather than what they CAN'T. What
> does it matter what they CAN'T do? I can't fly (without the help
> of an aircraft, that is). Nor can I hold my breath under water for
> more than about a minute, juggle multiple balls, or run the marathon:
> but so what? I CAN do a whole lot of other things, and it's THOSE
> I concentrate on, rather than on flying or holding my breath under
> I take my cue from my wife Claire, who can't walk. She can hardly
> even lift up a fork to her lips to eat, in fact. She has very little
> strength in her muscles from the neck down, as the result of a con-
> genital neuro-muscular condition which she has had since birth. But
> she CAN think, all the same, and so she has an excellent career as a
> very good lawyer!
> > As if in the process of elimination? Indeed, I find this to be in
> > contradiction to your previous statements, specifically:
> > "If the 12-year-old WANTS to
> > read but can't, surely something needs to be done"
> > I am of course assuming by this that you meant, perhaps, special
> > or perhaps special education. Let us not, on the issue, fluctuate to
> > drastically between personal interpretations of what qualifies as a
> > disorder" and what can reasonably by diagnosed by a medical
> No, here it's all dependent on what the person WANTS to do. Sup-
> pose a person WANTS to climb Mt. Everest, shouldn't they be
> given every encouragement, and any help if that's possible, even if
> it appears almost certain that they will fail?
> > Certainly, though I hold no specific expertise on the issue, I have had
> > limited personal experience with the (general) inherent fraudulence
> > within the disorder.
> Frankly I don't consider not being able to read a "disorder". It is a
> HANDICAP, in our very literate society, but it is NOT a disorder.
> My son Cyrus has great difficulty writing, and often switches b's
> and d's even now (at age 15). And he reads only with considerable
> difficulty. But that hasn't prevented him from devising three major
> inventions (one of them having been published at
> ... nor has it prevented him from amassing so much knowledge
> about engineering (his favourite subject) and science in general, that
> he is often right when his teachers in high school are wrong (and the
> teachers eventually have to admit it, because he has proof for
> almost everything he says!) He gets most of his knowledge from
> watching TV, especially the Discovery Channel and the Learning
> Channel, but also from *Star Trek* and other shows. And, of
> course, from THINKING about what he sees on TV.
> Reading and writing -- and 'rithmetic too -- are far less important
> than thinking: especially thinking independently and without pre-
> conceived notions.
> > I had a best friend at Sudbury years ago, who had to leave because his
> > mother pulled him out. Smart as razor, he was. Of course, contained
> > the walls of a High School in Newton, they diagnosed him with a learning
> > disorder, and he was forced to engage in special classes for years.
> That's terrible. His parents should have just left him alone, and he'd
> have found his own way. He should not have been forced to do or
> learn what his body obviously rebels against.
> As I often say to both Cyrus and his younger brother Arthur, the
> best thing one can do is DO NOTHING! One should learn from
> Lao Tzu, who says in his book *Tao Teh Ching*:
> The Tao does nothing, and yet nothing remains undone;
> The man of Tao does nothing, and thereby accomplishes
> One's own nature -- i.e., that which underlies one's body, mind and
> spirit -- will automatically do what is best for one, if only it is al-
> lowed to do it!
> > I just what overall clarification, which I deem of extreme importance:
> > Which do you mean? If child A cannot read, though he tries mightily,
> > he (1) be more focused on the things he does well, or (2) is he entitled
> > help from professionals outside of school? I am sure that all of the
> > behind your statements was not conveyed, and I look forward to hearing
> > true meaning from you.
> As I said, it all depends on what the person WANTS. (I hesitate to
> use the word "child", because the principle applies to people of all
> I myself do not compose music VERY well, but I LIKE to do it, so
> I do it, knowing all the same that I will never be a great composer.
> But I DO write very well, and my thinking is of the very best and
> highest quality, to which claim -- though I say so myself -- my
> works published on my Home Page amply testify: so I concentrate
> on writing and thinking more than on composing music.
> But I don't GIVE UP on music just because I do it only passably
> well! It's fun sometimes to do something that one knows one isn't
> ever going to be the best in.
> One should certainly go for anything one really and truly WANTS
> to do, even if one realises that will never be able to do it well or
> easily. (Cyrus WANTED to read the *Dune* series of novels, so
> he did so, even though reading anything is quite hard for him!) But
> one should not be MADE to do what OTHERS want him/her to
> Ardeshir <http://homepage.mac.com/ardeshir/AllMyFiles.html>.
> If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
> firstname.lastname@example.org (do NOT reply to the mailing list) with the following
> phrase in the BODY (not the subject) of the message, replacing
> "email@example.com" with the email address that you subscribed under:
> unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model firstname.lastname@example.org
> If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too
> you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to
> This mailing list is archived at http://www.sudval.org/~sdg/archives
If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
email@example.com (do NOT reply to the mailing list) with the following
phrase in the BODY (not the subject) of the message, replacing
"firstname.lastname@example.org" with the email address that you subscribed under:
unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model email@example.com
If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too much,
you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to
This mailing list is archived at http://www.sudval.org/~sdg/archives
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Mar 27 2002 - 19:39:49 EST