Re: DSM: RE: anger (was: teenagedom)

Date: Tue Jan 22 2002 - 22:31:25 EST

Dear Travis,

Thanks so much. You wrote:

<< There are so many things that are truly beautiful about the
 Sudbury Philosophies, but perhaps the most beautiful is the fact that
 everything falls into place after one understands his/her core views on the
 rights of children >>

To me, this core view is indeed exactly the point. Alternative and public
education tracks so similarly because their core view is the same. They
choose to view the child as an "improver". This view has tremendous utility
for educators. Their first order of business is to give a pre test. They do
this immediately to immediately show "ignorance". Once they have these
"results" they are immediately justified in offering and providing their
treatment, program, agenda, curriculum. After some suitable time delay, they
post test. And of course, they show improvement. Thus their whole view of the
child is validated. In fact though, they have exactly validated themselves by
defining the child.

Stunning, but in the educational paradigm, there are sadly only two choices
left to the child. Ignorance or become an "improver". Near crushing

So, when the four year old arrives at Sudbury, in that first moment at the
school house door, only offer the freedom freely. May they never even ever
smell the notion that freedom is program.

Warmest Regards,
Bill Richardson




If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO (do NOT reply to the mailing list) with the following
phrase in the BODY (not the subject) of the message, replacing
"email@host.dom" with the email address that you subscribed under:

unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model email@host.dom

If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too much,
you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to

This mailing list is archived at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Mar 27 2002 - 19:39:49 EST