In my previous post, I referred to the Fairhaven diploma as non-evaluative.
This, I just realized, is a misnomer: people at Fairhaven _have_ evaluated
that a certain amount of time (three years, right?) and attendance in good
standing are adequate measures that an individual has attained suffucient
experience to warrant a diploma. Every time a student pursues such a
diploma, some minimal evaluation must occur that s/he did in fact attain
the attendance/good standing criteria.
My apologies for perpetuating the obfuscative confusion...
Bruce
--------------------------------
"Cherish your best hopes as a faith, and abide
by them in action."
-- Margaret Fuller
===========
If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
majordomo@sudval.org (do NOT reply to the mailing list) with the following
phrase in the BODY (not the subject) of the message, replacing
"email@host.dom" with the email address that you subscribed under:
unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model email@host.dom
If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too much,
you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to
"dsm-digest"
This mailing list is archived at http://www.sudval.org/~sdg/archives
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Mar 27 2002 - 19:39:48 EST