DSM: diploma clarification

From: Bruce Smith (bsmith@coin.org)
Date: Sun Dec 16 2001 - 14:21:57 EST

In my previous post, I referred to the Fairhaven diploma as non-evaluative.
This, I just realized, is a misnomer: people at Fairhaven _have_ evaluated
that a certain amount of time (three years, right?) and attendance in good
standing are adequate measures that an individual has attained suffucient
experience to warrant a diploma. Every time a student pursues such a
diploma, some minimal evaluation must occur that s/he did in fact attain
the attendance/good standing criteria.

My apologies for perpetuating the obfuscative confusion...


"Cherish your best hopes as a faith, and abide
by them in action."

                                        -- Margaret Fuller


If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
majordomo@sudval.org (do NOT reply to the mailing list) with the following
phrase in the BODY (not the subject) of the message, replacing
"email@host.dom" with the email address that you subscribed under:

unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model email@host.dom

If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too much,
you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to

This mailing list is archived at http://www.sudval.org/~sdg/archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Mar 27 2002 - 19:39:48 EST