Thanks for replying.
I agree that things are likely to change for the better in the future.
I also think that it is the people who will have to lead: the "leaders"
will have to follow. (Funny, that, what?)
But my point is that in institutions of so-called "higher" learning
we have greater, not less, inertia and resistance to change than we
have in elementary and secondary schools. Until the universities,
colleges and research institutions of the world begin to throw off
the shackles of indoctrination -- the way Neill did decades ago in
Germany and England -- we won't get any institutions of "higher"
learning to which we should HOPE that homeschooled kids and
graduates of Sudbury / Summerhill type schools should go! On
the contrary, it ought to be our hope that our kids whom we have
brought up with considerable difficulty to think independently for
themselves will *not* throw away this precious gift when they
are eighteen, by enrolling in one of these brainwashing centres.
Besides, there are other ways to make a living than getting a job.
Just as one ought to think for oneself, one ought also to earn for
oneself -- not by selling one's self to a large corporation, but by
providing something useful and valuable to humanity as a whole.
If my kids do that when they are grown up, they might even make
much *more* money than if they were to get the best grades at a
presitigious university and then go to work for a multinational
After all, even Bill Gates (not that he's in any way my hero!) was
a *dropout* from Harvard, rather than a Harvard *graduate*. And
Steve Jobs, who co-founded Apple Computer, also did not get
to finish his university education. Right now I am using hardware
and software from both these dropouts in order to communicate
my ideas -- even those which I am communicating here.
> Hi there,
> Thanks for answering my post.
> I have to admit that I am not to familiar with the science field, which is
> why I said in most cases "sudbury universities" are unecessary and not in all
> Nevertheless, the point you bring up is a good one, i.e. "how many
> journalists who *do* puruse the truth get a decently-paying job at any good
> paper, magazine or TV
> First, I don't think there are many good paper, magazine or TV network, so
> right there, the market is limited.
> But, the point I would really like to make is the following...
> The media giants, much like the government-run school system, will never
> change from the top. For the media, it will take people who stop reading or
> watching them, advertisers to stop advertising in them, and journalists who
> don't take positions where they can't fully do their job.
> With the school system, it will take parents pulling their children out of
> the schools and teachers refusing to be agents of the state.
> In both cases, if the people lead, the leaders will follow because they will
> have to do so.
> In my opinion, the press is just as responsible for the government school
> mess we have as the gov. itself. BTW, the mess in education is what brought
> me to look for alternatives and led me to Sudbury.
> I may not be rich and I don't have a decently-paying job but at least, I'm
> not contributing to the media madness. Like you, I publish on the web and I
> sell a story once in a while. Much like parents who make sacrifices to send
> their children to private schools or homeschool instead of using the free but
> bad babysitter of the state, I'm poor but at least my conscience is at peace.
> I think that as people start to re-think the way we educate children, we will
> also start to re-think the way we educate adults for certain professions.
> Universities should be places of higher learning and research not a
> continuation of the K-12 endoctrination like they are now in many
> disciplines, especially at the undergrad level.
> People used to argue that homeschoolers would not get into colleges but now
> they do. I believe that eventually the myth that you cannot get a good job
> without a college education will also be proven wrong.
> My two cents,
If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
email@example.com with the following phrase in the BODY (not the
subject) of the message:
unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model [the-subscribed-email]
If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too much,
you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to
This mailing list is archived at http://www.sudval.org/~sdg/archives
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Nov 05 2001 - 20:24:29 EST