>In that case, would it *really* be better to let the child go back
>to a traditional school?
"Better"? No. Agreed, traditional schools are not *better* at inculcating
responsibility in students but I thought we were talking about students who,
for whatever reason, decide not to take responsibility for themselves and
proceed to poison the atmosphere of a Sudbury school. Due process at the
Sudbury school must ultimately allow for the expulsion of that student. To
suggest some kind of 'direction' or 'guidance' be offered that student
within the Sudbury school compromises its principles, if I understand them
correctly. My point is, compromise of this kind simply turns the Sudbury
school into a traditional school in this respect and so better to send the
student back to a traditional school where they already do that.
Compromising the principles in this regard will damage the school without
helping the student. The offering of 'direction' or 'guidance' is the
slippery slope that traditional schools have already slid down to find
themselves where they are today... "dealing" with irresponsible students.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ardeshir Mehta, N.D. <email@example.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: DSM: The Sudbury model -- appropriate for all children, yes or
> Hi there:
> Warren McMillan wrote:
> > ...
> > I'll just throw this in here as a thought... Isn't this perhaps what
> > traditional schools are for? I mean, freedom *with responsibility* is
> > central to the SVS philosophy. Take the responsibility out, as in the
> > of a child who *decides* not to take it, and what do you have? Freedom
> > licence. This cannot be good for the school or the student. What kind
> > 'direction' can you offer a child who *decides* not to take
> > This is not a skill or a talent we're talking about here. It is a
> > Isn't it? If so, then wouldn't it be better to let the child go back to
> > traditional school where they know all about dealing with children who
> > decide not to take responsibility.
> > Warren
> Let us admit for argument's sake, "Yes, this is what traditional
> schools are for, and yes, they do know all about dealing with
> children who decide not to take responsibility." But then the
> question surely looms large: "What happens when such kids
> become adults, as one day they will and must become?"
> Surely it cannot be said that a traditional school will be *better*
> able, in those intervening years, to inculcate a sense of repon-
> sibility in such kids than will a Summerhill / Sudbury model
> school. Can it?
> "Dealing with" such kids is a far cry from inculcating in them
> a sense of *real* responsibility -- and that is indispensable for
> *all* adults in *any* decent society. The latter takes years,
> though the former can even be accomplished with a few whacks
> of the cane on the behind!
> In that case, would it *really* be better to let the child go back
> to a traditional school?
> Ardeshir <http://homepage.mac.com/ardeshir/education.html>
> If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
> firstname.lastname@example.org with the following phrase in the BODY (not the
> subject) of the message:
> unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model [the-subscribed-email]
> If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too
> you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to
> This mailing list is archived at http://www.sudval.org/~sdg/archives
If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
email@example.com with the following phrase in the BODY (not the
subject) of the message:
unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model [the-subscribed-email]
If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too much,
you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to
This mailing list is archived at http://www.sudval.org/~sdg/archives
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Nov 05 2001 - 20:24:29 EST