> >There is, of course, nothing to stop a School Meeting from
> >"actively/officially/institutionally interven(ing) to help troubled
> Sure there is: it's respect for the individual, for his or her right to
> for help (or not), to decide for himself or herself how to resolve
> problems. JCs and School Meetings do impose sentences for rule violations.
> These sentences may have the effect of reinforcing more constructive
> behavior. Beyond sentencing, mediation is utilized at some schools as a
> of dealing with complex interpersonal issues.
I understand and agree with your reasoning as it pertains to whether or not
it would be a good idea for the SM to create a rule mandating some kind of
intervention to help troubled students. However, I don't see any reason why
they could not do so if the majority so desired.
If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
firstname.lastname@example.org with the following phrase in the BODY (not the
subject) of the message:
unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model [the-subscribed-email]
If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too much,
you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to
This mailing list is archived at http://www.sudval.org/~sdg/archives
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Nov 05 2001 - 20:24:29 EST