Sam Senteney wrote:
> Hybrids do not work.
Alexander / Michiru Streater wrote:
Well blimey ! That's a b o l d statment.? Can you give some examples
and reasons why it failed?
I am reading a great book right now, _very carefully_ . It's called
"ANNOUNCING A NEW SCHOOL..." by Daniel Greenberg.
It seems that SVS tried this and that and really went through quite a process
to work things out, and he so freely shares what he learned.
Thank you Daniel Greenberg.
Los Angeles, California
Alexander / Michiru Streater wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> I said:
> > "Free schools frighten many people simply because they have no
> > idea how it can all work. Having a "all or nothing", "take it or leave it"
> > approach does nothing to bring the nervous on board."
> > To me this is a good thing and exactly the point! We in Sacramento have
> > more than our share of "nervous" on board, and after all is said and done
> > they almost always leave. And usually it is not a plesant experience. On
> > the other hand, those who buy the "all or nothing", "take it or leave it"
> > our philosophy stick around and are contributing members of the community.
> Of course ! But that is because you -are- an SVS model school. No-one
> is arguing with that. And to have the nervous on board is -definately- an
> error. Well done .
> But the discussion is now at a tangent. The trojon horse is not for SVS
> model schools, but for ordinary ones. If you have full SVS status, no
> > Hybrids do not work.
> Well blimey ! That's a b o l d statment.? Can you give some examples
> and reasons why it failed?
> > A Sudbury school is what it is, and parts-swapping
> > creates something that is not a Sudbury school. "A regular school that
> > provides more choice to it's students about what they do during the day"
> > not a Sudbury School.
> Agreed. Blimey ! Agreed. Please don't think anyone was.
> > You can call it a hybrid Sudbury if you want, but is
> > more like a prison that offers McDonalds in addition to the regular dinner
> > fare. It may offer more choice, but still is not freedom by any stretch
> > the imagination.
> Well that's a start!
> > "A sliding approach needs to be provided." You can offer Taco Bell next
> > year or possibly two or three kinds of toothpaste the year after, but for
> > all that sliding you still don't have freedom, just a few more choices.
> And the n a few more, and more and then you are on the road to freedom.
> And getting on the road is the first step.
> > Do the smooth and successful conversion of the more extreme and regimented
> > schools, but don't tinker with creating the missing link, because there is
> > none.
> You lost me. What are you talking about?
> Alexander Streater
> Message to fellow teachers
> Children learn inspite of us, not because of us!
> If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
> email@example.com with the following phrase in the BODY (not the
> subject) of the message:
> unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model [the-subscribed-email]
> If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too much,
> you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to
> This mailing list is archived at http://www.sudval.org/~sdg/archives
If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
firstname.lastname@example.org with the following phrase in the BODY (not the
subject) of the message:
unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model [the-subscribed-email]
If you are interested in the subject, but the volume of mail sent is too much,
you may wish to consider unsubscribing from this list and subscribing to
This mailing list is archived at http://www.sudval.org/~sdg/archives
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Nov 05 2001 - 20:24:29 EST