snipped and eddited
> I felt like Alexander was in rant mode and I don't mind being an
> object of someone's rant if it makes them feel better
> I actually felt rather put out by Alexander's first posting
Dear Liz Reid,
You could not be more wrong.
Please re-read my post. You'll notice I'm replying to -your- question,
and writing what "they" think.
> I was the first to comment on my negative reaction to the relaxation
Indeed, and you are to be much commended for your self analysis. We
all find it hard to stop ourselves and think. I am sure I am amoung the
worst offenders, which is why I so admire your frank admission, and
thus my response.
> I didn't think that I was in any way attacking the value of
> play or relaxation for children.
For the record, I do not think for a minute you were.
> The way I understand it, the need for relaxation is a result of having
> lived in a far from relaxing environment. Perhaps the word is
> stressful. Children in free-schools are self-regulated and when a
> person is healthy and in a healthy environment their systems will
> ensure that they are getting the amount of stress and relaxation that
> they need. This will just be a part of what they are doing and
> possibly never enter their consciousness.
(there is probably
some cute latin phrase
that can be inserted here
ending in est ;-)
Message to fellow teachers
Children learn inspite of us, not because of us!
If you wish to be removed from this mailing list, please send an email TO
firstname.lastname@example.org with the following phrase in the BODY (not the
subject) of the message:
unsubscribe discuss-sudbury-model [the-subscribed-email]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Nov 05 2001 - 20:24:29 EST