Re: Re[2]: DSM: The Value of the Sudbury Model

From: Scott Gray (sdg@aramis.sudval.org)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 09:17:28 EDT


Rhonda Goebel <rhondagoebel@core.com> sent this to the list. It was
bounced because, sometimes, our anti-spamming efforts prevent legitimate
users from posting. (Rhonda, do you want me to add the
rhondagoebel@core.com address to the list?)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 07:34:40 -0500
From: "rhonda Goebel" <rhondagoebel@core.com>
To: discuss-sudbury-model@aramis.sudval.org
Subject: Re: Re[2]: DSM: The Value of the Sudbury Model

When researching how societies - including ours - first began 'taking
responsibility' for the 'education'of the young, you will often find clear
evidence of the true motives: indoctrination and manipulation of the
powerless to meet political and economic desires of the powerful. In the
process, governments deliberately take away the rights of families AND the
rights of children through forced 'education'. If our country is supposed
to be a democracy of free individuals, then why do we tolerate the fascism
of mainstream education?

Rhonda

> Why is it not the responsibility of society/community to educate the future
> generation



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Nov 05 2001 - 20:24:28 EST