Alan Klein (Alan@klein.net)
Sun, 4 Mar 2001 21:15:48 -0500
While I found John's remarks bewildering and offensive, I am utterly
perplexed at your logic here. How can it be that, just because someone would
have been executed for their remarks in the past, they are wrong (or at
least "overstated") now?
John was clearly wrong to assert that minorities have "passed laws in their
favor that eliminated individuality or individual rights." It is majorities
that pass the laws, whether it be in the Congress or in a SM.
----- Original Message -----
> This is Stuart Williams-Ley, a staff member at Cedarwood Sudbury School in
> Santa Clara, responding to John's comments about how both democracy and
> American ethic are hostile to individual liberty. Throughout most of
> John would have been imprisoned or executed for remarks so opposed to the
> official views of the state. Thus I think John is overstating his case.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 29 2001 - 11:16:50 EST