Re: DSM: Sudbury Schools in an Urban setting


Prohibido1@aol.com
Sun, 4 Feb 2001 19:05:41 EST


In a message dated 2/4/01 8:22:31 AM Pacific Standard Time,
kristin@harkness.net writes:

<< We do not know all the facts,
 so we do not know why the JC considered this student's actions to be
 dangerous. >>

The child walked off campus. He walked home. He did it more than once. The
police picked him up. The school didn't look good. The child was finally
charged with dangerous behavior, AFTER the school looked bad. The dangerous
behavior that he exhibited was walking off campus to his home. There was an
open campus policy. He DID NOT break a rule.
It was a vague charge at best.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 29 2001 - 11:16:33 EST