DSM: Subtle Coercion?

CindyK (cindyk@unitz.on.ca)
Sat, 6 Jan 2001 10:20:41 -0500

Bruce Smith wrote:

> Sudbury purists maintain is that even to suggest, or to make available,
> items of possible study without first waiting for students to express an
> interest -- in other words, to entice or preemptively direct students --
> is, in a way, even worse than naked coercion, since at least with that
> there's no chance of mistaking the adults' role.

This is a point that has come up in the past and I'm not quite sure I
understand it. I haven't read all the material on SVS yet so please bear
with me.

I find it hard to imagine myself not ever influencing another person with my
interests. How can I not have items of possible study around? Just filling
the school with resources will do that. There will be books in all the
rooms - books on a number of interesting subjects, perhaps a photo lab, a
sewing room or a woodworking area, even blocks in a corner. Will, not the
presence of these resource materials influence some students? Am I sneakily
coercing them to pick up a book by just having it in the room? How can I
have a school with white walls and bare bookshelves? I think I understand
your purist point but in reality I think that it's inevitable that they are
going to be influenced by the people around them. We are all influenced by
those around us.

I think we can have the material available but the students need to initiate
the interest. Some will pick up one book, others will pick up another.
Just as, if I see a friend doing something interesting I will ask her about
it. If I'm not interested, I won't ask. But I certainly wouldn't expect
people around me to never show me anything. I don't think that they are
being coercive by showing me either unless they try to push it but that's
another story.

Do you really think that the purist view could work? Maybe I'm missing


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 29 2001 - 11:15:55 EST