Re: DSM: Interest increasing?


Prohibido1@aol.com
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 19:35:19 EST


In a message dated 1/5/01 3:04:05 PM Pacific Standard Time,
booroobin@squirrel.com.au writes:

<< I believe that the SM and the JC in their evolved forms make a lot of
sense,
 and are valid components of a SVM School. >>

Valid yes, but not both necessary. Consensus has been used in place of J.C.
and it seems to concentrate on the human element more by putting more
importance in relationships instead of punishment.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 29 2001 - 11:15:53 EST