Martin Wilke (email@example.com)
Fri, 05 Jan 2001 21:30:17 +0100
Connie Shaw schrieb:
> Joe writes:
> > I believe that structures such as School Meeting and JC are not
> > part of the model, and in a Sudbury Model school, the participants DO
> > what structures to use...
> > I'm interested, since the only real constants of the model is that the
> > students and staff see to the day-to-day governance, and that learning is
> > student-led (two concepts you are in harmony with), why aren't you
> > a Sudbury School?
> By this definition, we are a Sudbury school. I was taking care not to use
> that label, because my previous interactions with staff at a Sudbury school
> I visited, and with a founders group in California led me to believe that
> the model included the forms of governance.
I think that at least the School Meeting is crucial for being a Sudbury
School. If you had, instead, a principal who decides everything, but who
is elected by students and staff members, this would still be
democratic, but it wouldn't be a Sudbury School. As I understood it, the
School Meeting is the heart of a Sudbury School. And you can't live
without having a heart.
Maybe the JC is not absolutely necessary, one could deal with all the
judicial stuff in the School Meeting.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 29 2001 - 11:15:48 EST