Susan Jarquin (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Fri, 05 Jan 2001 05:10:07 -0800
<snip from message>
So, my question now is, is it helpful to use the label? I'd be interested to
hear what people on this list have to say about this. In talking to people
about the Living School, I find that when I mention Sudbury, very few people
have heard of it. For those that have, it does offer a good reference point
for what we're about. For those who haven't, there is the possibility that
they will look at the SVS website and learn more.
<end snip from message, shown in it's entirety in this e-mail>
Susan here in Los Angeles, California.
This week I signed up my kids under an umbrella school in California. I advised
the administrator that I was considering becoming a Founder for a Sudbury
school. Her eyes became wide and said you mean there are more than the one in
Sudbury, Massachusetts. She followed by saying I have people who might be
interested. She stated that she wasn't knowledgeable about the model but had
interest because of an author by the name of John Gotto's favorable words about
I have ordered one of his books and her group has a discussion group that meets
weekly. I will report back after reading his material.
Connie Shaw wrote:
> Joe writes:
> > I believe that structures such as School Meeting and JC are not
> > part of the model, and in a Sudbury Model school, the participants DO
> > what structures to use...
> > I'm interested, since the only real constants of the model is that the
> > students and staff see to the day-to-day governance, and that learning is
> > student-led (two concepts you are in harmony with), why aren't you
> > a Sudbury School?
> By this definition, we are a Sudbury school. I was taking care not to use
> that label, because my previous interactions with staff at a Sudbury school
> I visited, and with a founders group in California led me to believe that
> the model included the forms of governance.
> So, my question now is, is it helpful to use the label? I'd be interested to
> hear what people on this list have to say about this. In talking to people
> about the Living School, I find that when I mention Sudbury, very few people
> have heard of it. For those that have, it does offer a good reference point
> for what we're about. For those who haven't, there is the possibility that
> they will look at the SVS website and learn more.
> Does anyone know why the schools that Joe mentions that apparently *are*
> Sudbury schools by his definition (New School and Tutorial School), choose
> not to use the label?
> -Connie Shaw
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 29 2001 - 11:15:47 EST