Re: DSM: Two responses


Dennis Shaughnessy (deshau@jps.net)
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:17:30 -0800


----- Original Message -----
From: <Msadofsky@aol.com>
To: <discuss-sudbury-model@aramis.sudval.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: DSM: Two responses

> In a message dated 11/21/2000 2:52:02 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> deshau@jps.net writes:
>
> > Another post concerned necessary and sufficient conditions for a
Sudbury
> > model school. Besides the
> > Assembly, here's a list:
> > 1)No curriculum
> > 2)Staff hired and fired solely by staff and students
> > 3)Jury of peers (JC)
>
> Sorry to quibble, but there are schools that are quite well in the Sudbury
> model, and quite happily, where #2 does not apply.
> Mimsy
>
Although #2 applies to SVS.
Dennis



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Nov 23 2000 - 07:48:02 EST