Rick Stansberger (email@example.com)
Wed, 08 Nov 2000 11:46:00 -0700
the main problem is with the tests themselves. They don't measure real
knowledge. Real command of knowledge only shows itself in the presence of a
true problem. A true problem is not one in which the answer is known and must
be picked from a pile (That is just an exercise), but one in which the answer
doesn't yet exist and must be discovered or created. You may eliminate guessing
from computer-graded standardized tests, but the only way you can measure true
knowledge is by how a person uses the knowns to find the unknowns. And thus the
unknowns must be truly unknown to the person, and not just one of a pile of
Arie Dirkzwager wrote:
> With Multiple Evaluation we have a testing method with much less
> measurement error than the traditional Multiple Choice as guessing and
> gambling is really eliminated (not just "corrected for"). See
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~aried/MSMTERR.htm for a short article on this. The
> method is based on eliciting personal probabilities instead of "pock one".
> It should be used widely as a replacement of Multiple Choice. For more see
> my web site and the links it gives. I'd appreciate any comments.
> Arie Dirkzwager
> Educational Instrumentation Technology,
> Computers in Education.
> Huizerweg 62,
> 1402 AE Bussum,
> The Netherlands.
> voice: x31-35-6981676
> E-mail: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
> web site featuring educational testing methods:
> When reading the works of an important thinker, look first for the
> apparent absurdities in the text and ask yourself how a sensible person
> could have written them." T. S. Kuhn, The Essential Tension (1977).
> Accept that some days you are the statue, and some days you are the bird.
-- "Heaven and skid row are separated only by an act of consciousness." Robert A. Johnson
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Nov 09 2000 - 19:57:26 EST