Re: DSM: Majority Rule vs. Consensus


Melissa Tyson (mvtyson@hotmail.com)
Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:10:13 GMT


vehemently opposed

>From: "Melissa Tyson" <mvtyson@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: discuss-sudbury-model@sudval.org
>To: discuss-sudbury-model@sudval.org
>Subject: Re: DSM: Majority Rule vs. Consensus
>Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:49:06 GMT
>
>Does anyone know of any essays or the like expounding upon the idea that
>neither our democratic government nor its citizens should object so
>vehemently to a school based on freedom and democratic principles?
>
>You know --specifically.
>
>--mvt
>
>
>>From: Joseph Roach <josroach@yahoo.com>
>>Reply-To: discuss-sudbury-model@sudval.org
>>To: discuss-sudbury-model@sudval.org
>>Subject: Re: DSM: Majority Rule vs. Consensus
>>Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 04:57:56 -0800 (PST)
>>
>>Greetings Martin,
>>
>>Joe Roach from The New School in Delaware here.
>>
>>Consensus always sound benign, doesn't it?
>>Personally, I find consensus to be a very subtle,
>>insidious form of coersion. Children often disagree
>>with each other -- sometimes for personal reasons,
>>sometimes for reasons of principle... I want a child
>>to be free to disagree.
>>
>>In any democratic organization, a great weakness can
>>the unfettered rule of the majority. Good
>>organization building means ensuring the rights of
>>people who may find themselves in a minority. Such
>>rights can be guarded through the charter or by-laws
>>of the school. Consensus-building can be every bit as
>>unfair as majority rule.
>>
>>Good luck and best regards,
>>
>>Joe Roach
>>The New School
>>Newark, Delaware
>>
>>--- Martin Wilke <martin.wilke@gmx.net> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I and three parents are going to (try to) start a
>> > non-coercive school in
>> > Berlin. On our first informal meeting we found that
>> > we have quite
>> > different ideas of how decisions should be made in a
>> > non-coercive
>> > school.
>> > While I think majority should decide they insist on
>> > consensus. Their
>> > main argument is that the majority would oppress the
>> > minority. That
>> > discussions would be ended as soon as it is clear
>> > that a motion will get
>> > a majority, and thus the minority would simply be
>> > ignored. What
>> > experience do you have in School Meetings or
>> > Assemblies with this point?
>> >
>> > Martin Wilke
>> >
>> >
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
>>http://im.yahoo.com
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue Sep 26 2000 - 14:58:25 EDT