Sat, 2 Oct 1999 13:44:20 EDT
In a message dated 10/2/99 12:54:42 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
<< > I could see, maybe, sending a kid to school for 6 months, max, to learn
> these things, if the teaching were demonstrated to work. So, what's with the
> other 11.5 years?
I could see this, too, and it would be when a kid was so ready (whatever
that means) to learn these basics, instead of some arbitrary age (like
6) for everyone.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Dec 23 1999 - 09:01:59 EST