Re: DSM: Dismal according to their own measure...


WarOnTies@aol.com
Sat, 2 Oct 1999 13:44:20 EDT


In a message dated 10/2/99 12:54:42 PM, swoodall@bluecrab.org writes:

<< > I could see, maybe, sending a kid to school for 6 months, max, to learn
> these things, if the teaching were demonstrated to work. So, what's with the
> other 11.5 years?
>
I could see this, too, and it would be when a kid was so ready (whatever
that means) to learn these basics, instead of some arbitrary age (like
6) for everyone.
>>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Dec 23 1999 - 09:01:59 EST